{主关键词}
163
SC expresses concern over hate speeches made against minority communities_我的网站
一 |
[ 海外谍照] 近日，我们从相关渠道获取到了一组科尔维特(参数|询价)Zora车型的无伪装实车测试谍照。新车作为科尔维特C8系列的旗舰性能版本，将会搭载5.5T涡轮增压V8发动机+电动机形成混合动力系统，系统综合功率或超过1200马力。 New Delhi, Oct 21 (UNI) Expressing its serious concern over the way, some of the hate speeches were made against the minority communities during recent religious congregations, the Supreme Court questioned as to where we have reached, what have we reduced religion to?
"Where have we reached? What have we reduced religion to? What have we reduced God to? It is tragic," a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice K M Joseph and also comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy, observed.
"The statements are certainly very shocking for a country that is to be religion neutral," the Supreme Court said, and expressed shock at some of the statements and hate speech made against minority communities during certain recent religious congregations.
The Apex Court was hearing a plea filed by the petitioner, Shaheen Abdullah, seeking urgent direction, interventions and or orders to stop the hate speeches made against the Muslim community.
"A country which is a democracy and religion neutral, you are saying it there should be action in IPC. But it's against one community. It is sad," the Supreme Court observed.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, Abdullah, presented a recent "Hindu Sabha" as an example where BJP MP from West Delhi, Parvesh Verma, called for the "total boycott" of "these people" apparently referring to Muslims.
The Supreme Court said, in its order that "the respondent (authorities) will issue directions to their subordinates in this regard without looking at the religion of the accused, so that the secular nature of India is preserved.*
The Supreme Court also in its order directed that the respective governments and police authorities should take suo motu action in cases of hate speeches and they should not wait for lodging of a formal complaint.
"Such action is needed to be taken to preserve secular character of the country," the Supreme Court observed and expressed its shock over the way the hate speeches are made.
Abdullah, the petitioner, said the Muslim community is being "targeted and terrorised" by the participation of the members of the ruling political party in delivering the hate speeches.
The Supreme Court in its order directed the Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand police to take Suo Motu cognizance action against any instance of hate speech in the State without waiting for a complaint to be filed.
The Supreme Court also made it clear that if there is a lack of action by the police and authorities, it will result in contempt of court against the concerned authority or person.
The Supreme Court also sought action taken report from Delhi police on alleged hate speeches made by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament, Parvesh Verma and others in Delhi on October 9 against Muslim community.
Sibal argued that we have filed many complaints. This Court or administration never takes action! Always status reports. These people are participating in events on daily basis.
"The Administration does nothing. We keep coming to Court," Sibal pleaded for action.
While reading the alleged speeches of Varma, the Court read, "If need be, we will slit their throats", (Bench reads). It said, it is very sad and tragic.
Sibal said, Yes, him and team. He is an MP of the party (BJP).
"We need an SIT (Special Investigation Team) to make sure that it doesn't get repeated," Sibal pleaded to the Supreme Court.
UNI SM SHK2105。
友情提示：如果您有新车谍照/新车爆料，请点击编辑头像（仅限App）私信给我们，期待您的来信。
。"Where have we reached? What have we reduced religion to? What have we reduced God to? It is tragic," a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice K M Joseph and also comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy, observed.
"The statements are certainly very shocking for a country that is to be religion neutral," the Supreme Court said, and expressed shock at some of the statements and hate speech made against minority communities during certain recent religious congregations.
The Apex Court was hearing a plea filed by the petitioner, Shaheen Abdullah, seeking urgent direction, interventions and or orders to stop the hate speeches made against the Muslim community.
"A country which is a democracy and religion neutral, you are saying it there should be action in IPC. But it's against one community. It is sad," the Supreme Court observed.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, Abdullah, presented a recent "Hindu Sabha" as an example where BJP MP from West Delhi, Parvesh Verma, called for the "total boycott" of "these people" apparently referring to Muslims.
The Supreme Court said, in its order that "the respondent (authorities) will issue directions to their subordinates in this regard without looking at the religion of the accused, so that the secular nature of India is preserved.*
The Supreme Court also in its order directed that the respective governments and police authorities should take suo motu action in cases of hate speeches and they should not wait for lodging of a formal complaint.
"Such action is needed to be taken to preserve secular character of the country," the Supreme Court observed and expressed its shock over the way the hate speeches are made.
Abdullah, the petitioner, said the Muslim community is being "targeted and terrorised" by the participation of the members of the ruling political party in delivering the hate speeches.
The Supreme Court in its order directed the Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand police to take Suo Motu cognizance action against any instance of hate speech in the State without waiting for a complaint to be filed.
The Supreme Court also made it clear that if there is a lack of action by the police and authorities, it will result in contempt of court against the concerned authority or person.
The Supreme Court also sought action taken report from Delhi police on alleged hate speeches made by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament, Parvesh Verma and others in Delhi on October 9 against Muslim community.
Sibal argued that we have filed many complaints. This Court or administration never takes action! Always status reports. These people are participating in events on daily basis.
"The Administration does nothing. We keep coming to Court," Sibal pleaded for action.
While reading the alleged speeches of Varma, the Court read, "If need be, we will slit their throats", (Bench reads). It said, it is very sad and tragic.
Sibal said, Yes, him and team. He is an MP of the party (BJP).
"We need an SIT (Special Investigation Team) to make sure that it doesn't get repeated," Sibal pleaded to the Supreme Court.
UNI SM SHK2105。
友情提示：如果您有新车谍照/新车爆料，请点击编辑头像（仅限App）私信给我们，期待您的来信。
二 |
三 |
Current article:http://licf6f.longdachemakuanshan.pics/1lh4s/20260826/7561.html
Published on:19:44:02
- 1428604福建雷雨天气频繁“打卡” 闷热继续在线
- 416249613岁上海女孩靠AI三天赚1.8万 当事人：几乎不懂编程 写作业会分神偷玩手机
- 3433水利部8月24日继续发布洪水黄色预警
- 82055“十五五”开好局起好步｜定州：加快建设农业强市 夯实兴农富民根基
- 7930065US Pentagon official’s Manila speech exposes alliance fragility, with Philippines likely to bear costs of provocations: Chinese expert
- 800644这几种错误的充电方法 会严重影响手机寿命
- 487366三星Galaxy Note 8开启Android Pie Beta项目
- 91161“两人三座”原是无奈，应正视火车儿童托管服务真实需求
- 441344央行：8月12日7天期逆回购操作量为零
- 3698798乔布斯妻子出席库克卸任聚会，约200人参加该聚会，即将上任的首席执行官约翰 · 特努斯向库克致意
- 5012024新加坡移民政策与常见途径
- 5495945中国跳水队本届世锦赛第8金：陈芋汐+全红婵=冠军
- 602299英特尔高级副总裁桑德拉·里维拉：2020年大量5G终端上市
- 4977742途虎养车以优质供给激活汽车后市场消费潜力,途虎养车以优质供给激活汽车后市场消费潜力
- 2278方寸彩票，幸会华夏千年丹青
- 9109夫妻共享产假增加 中小企业担心对运作影响大
- 4194索尼抱着《血源》有钱不赚？宫崎英高你早说《黄昏血族》是多人啊！
- 904联想拯救者云游戏掌机 C700 发布：支持腾讯 START，首发 1999 元
- 690522Chinese experts complete earthquake survey in Venezuela
- 15475深圳龙华城管回应“暴雨天浇花”：给高架桥下的绿化带浇水
- 4660数据中心关停？FSD入华无望？特斯拉中国辟谣：正常运转 辅助驾驶招聘工作在加速进行
- 94163条地铁直达！杭州重要枢纽未来出行有变
我的网站热门国内
- Copyright ＠ 2016-2017 我的网站 版权所有